On the weekend Alejandro and I started working on the entire concept of the project, not just as a sound piece but a multi-sensory experience. We started with finding which element in the story we wanted to work on the most. We narrowed it down to four scenes/themes:

                                          1 Eating the egg
                                          2 "I like watching her move"
                                          3 Giving birth
                                          4 Gun + Love scene

After drawing arcs for each scenes and imagining the sound composition, we decided to go with the first one - eating the egg. So we started contextualizing this piece. We imagined a meal course with just one course - the egg, made out of mystic and magical ingredients. You can only eat the egg in a specific constructed space with an audio piece that will guide, stimulate, complete the whole tasting experience. We were referencing to the rituals and designs of the Ayahuasca journey. Yet putting that into a futuristic + extraterrestrial setting.  



We sketched the audio piece into 4 sessions.
1 contemplate the egg
2 consume the egg
3 feel the egg inside
4 mind awake

We implemented from Bloodchild, how the egg of T'Gatoi made them feel relaxed and dreamy. Which set the tone for session 3. 

Before we started playing with the sounds, we began with imagining what the egg desert would really look like,  the environment where it will be consumed,  how will it be served, the mood it should stimulate and anything else that can contextualize the sounds.


During the whole making of the project, questions started floating. How consumption of food or any other kind of information get inside of us effect the body and mind in different ways? What is the balance between outsourced stimulation and one's own feelings and thoughts, do we have original feelings and thoughts or we are just simply reacting to everything around us? Once information leaks inside of us, does the body and mind ever forget? How hard it is to forget? As we drink from a plastic bottle, are we embedded with plastic?




After a few small struggles to get the audio file into our iPhones, which has always been an itch with the IOS, we managed to map ourselves right in front of Saint Mark's Church in-the-bowery, and the journey began. When we heard this was going to be an one hour walk, my body shook inside a little, thinking we might loose the tempo to keep up with the story, eventually ending in us becoming two mice lost in the maze of east village. That, never happened. The walk couldn't have been more inlined with the audio, the female instructor who would pop up in transitions of stories was like a wizard who knew exactly where we were, what was on our right side at one exact moment, and how long it would take for us to cross one street from another, leading us to the next stop elegantly. The structure and pace of Passing Strangers was as beautiful and smooth as a river in Spring.

Just to keep things short, I am writing in bullet points of some other thoughts of the walk that I very much enjoyed.
1       The vivid scenery composition and construction of stories. There were quite a few moments that by using sounds the creator built up a scene so colorful and vivid that I felt could be in that moment with the characters in that story. 

2       The richness of voices. The audio piece did not choose to use one unique narrator, instead using various narratives and extra voices as a collective ingredient. It kept the 90 minute walk colorful, and gave the story more texture.

3        The readings of poems by different people, non-poets. I have to say, I do have love for poetry but embarrassingly, my uncultured knowledge, I only recognized two poets from the audio. However, by hearing unfamiliar poets' poems, I found myself feeling more familiar with their stories somehow.

4         The power of audio does not limit to sounds. Maybe this sentence is too obscure, what I mean is when I'm listening to the audio, I hear them, but simultaneously the sounds are triggering my brain to create moving images in my mind. Because of that, and because it's my own interpretation and imagination of the stories, it is almost more powerful than watching a ready made video telling the same story. I've also had a similar discussion on this topic earlier this summer, why listening to audio porn is so much more arousing than watching porn. Of course, this has a lot to do with the production quality of porn these days, but also, that goes back to the topic of the limitation of ready made video vs. the negative space for one's own imagination that audio gifts you.



This is definitely a heavy and worth discussing topic especially in the "art" world, where reference is left ambiguous and where the most sharpest and deadly weapon to an artist's work is being called as a "derivative".

On the topic of everything is remixing, and "Art is sourced. Apprentices graze in the field of culture." In Kevin Kelly's latest book The Inevitable, he spent a whole chapter on the topic of Remixing, he stated that Paul Romer, an economist at New York University who specializes in the theory of economic growth, says real sustainable economic growth does not stem from new resources but from existing resources that are rearranged to make them more valuable. He ended the chapter with this strong sentence, affirmative as a man could be - "In 30 year the most important cultural works and the most powerful mediums will be those that have been remixed the most." In this sense, I see a fundamental difference between Kanye West and Richard Prince.

The significant emphasis of referencing and sourcing in the academic world and also the programming/coding world is a demonstration of good practice - earnest and transparent with knowledge. Why can't the creative art world join the movement? Even Newton admitted he had giants to step on.